| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. EVE Online ITERATIONS: Re-elect Seleene to CSM 7 - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
I was browsing thru the other (potential) candidates, but honestly, there's no one that will be as valuable, thrust worthy and defender of player base as seleene will be. All others actually seems self centered on they own agenda.. If you voting ...
- by The Kan - at 2012.02.11 01:47:00
|
2. 4 BoB motherships down - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: The Kan on 09/05/2010 19:09:17 Originally by: Vladic Ka Payback is a *****. 4 titans > 4 moms any day dude. Anyway, she had one hell of a run, survived countless hot drops, some from PL, Ra and others, killed countle...
- by The Kan - at 2010.05.09 19:07:00
|
3. Capital Ships in Dominion 1.1 - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Thank you CCP Abathur. Now i can go back to my parked mommy again
- by The Kan - at 2009.12.21 11:42:00
|
4. WTS - Nyx - in Sell Orders [original thread]
Bump for a old friend
- by The Kan - at 2009.12.10 12:00:00
|
5. [Petition] Have GM's Dock all Motherships Until they Are De-Nerfed - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
/Signed Altho i parked my nyx in a alt, it's still a active account im paying to keep that piece of junk that i could use for other stuff
- by The Kan - at 2009.12.06 14:29:00
|
6. New Dev Blog: Capital Ships In Dominion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Ap0ll0n Originally by: Kraken Kill Just do this. Motherships Get Dread Jump range. Motherships get 20 Drones at Lvl 5 carrier. Citadel torps AND Cruise get 1500 Explosion Radius, Torps (and compact get roughly 60ms ...
- by The Kan - at 2009.11.20 19:35:00
|
7. New Dev Blog: Capital Ships In Dominion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: The Mittani The danger of taking a position of 'democracy' and 'transparency' - by creating the CSM to allow for player feedback, having devs interact with players at length at Fanfest, and then having a multiple-week proces...
- by The Kan - at 2009.11.20 19:13:00
|
8. New Dev Blog: Capital Ships In Dominion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP: Serious question. dont delete this post i want a answer. The default insurance value will also be kept in dominion for the moms? or they will be gone as planned?
- by The Kan - at 2009.11.20 10:09:00
|
9. New Dev Blog: Capital Ships In Dominion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
thank you for reversing the moms change, now we can be insta-pop'ed by titan give the moms a HP buff or imunity to the ddd so we dont drop like fly's, this is nuts!!
- by The Kan - at 2009.11.20 09:27:00
|
10. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Jordan Musgrat If you're intent on allowing supercarriers to dock, at least don't let them rep up in stations, at all. Give us some RP reason like "this station is not equipped to handle the restructuring needs of such a lar...
- by The Kan - at 2009.11.18 21:27:00
|
11. [Petition ] Reverse changes to Supercarrier - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
/signed 1001 times
- by The Kan - at 2009.11.13 08:50:00
|
12. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP is not right you deleted my posts and other people's post. We have the right to speak, we have the righ of speech and by deleted our posts entirly, we are denying us of that right. Even if it is words you dont want to ear. In short, i dont ...
- by The Kan - at 2009.11.13 08:38:00
|
13. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
THIS IS RE-TAR-DED get this rolled back ccp, and while you at it, FIRE THE GUY THAT CAME UP WITH THIS!
- by The Kan - at 2009.11.12 19:20:00
|
14. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP 1 more thing: if you keep this changes, mark my words: I WILL SELF DESTRUCT. i do not want to keep paying a account to be OFFLINE all the time, day and night. i simply refuse to do that anymore.
- by The Kan - at 2009.11.12 17:31:00
|
15. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
ccp it's not funny, you deleted my previous post? lmao anyway, im not gonna quit my 4 acc's, no point in doing that because I LOVE THIS GAME but honestly, you screwing up TOO MUTCH. you want constructive feedback? ways to improve? ROLL THIS CRA...
- by The Kan - at 2009.11.12 17:16:00
|
16. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Nozh Hey, The changes on Singularity now, are intentional. The drone control units are however broken at the moment, and are being fixed. New stats for "Compact Citadel Torpedoes" (launched by fighter bombers): Explo...
- by The Kan - at 2009.11.12 16:17:00
|
17. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
yay \o/ back to useless paperweight why field a ship so expensive just to do slightly above dread damage?
- by The Kan - at 2009.11.11 12:21:00
|
18. *WTS* Tons of faction stuff - in Sell Orders [original thread]
bump for a friend. buy his stuff guys.
- by The Kan - at 2009.09.24 20:52:00
|
19. Dominion Supercarrier Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Viper ****zIe stuff back paddle faster. im not saying moms are solo ships, they should not be solo ships. they survive longer in sisi, yes, because rarely there's a HIC around. and i never been in rancer, geez... brain...
- by The Kan - at 2009.09.18 10:40:00
|
20. Dominion Supercarrier Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Here's my prespective, from flying a nyx for more than 2 years, and been part of 3 major wars with it, and now sisi extensive testing: - HP boost: was needed. Alto, 4x on the primary tank type sounds "awesome", it inst. Problem with it, is that a...
- by The Kan - at 2009.09.18 09:16:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |